SUMMARY:  Indigenous aboriginal language architecture is based on INTEGRATION while WESTERN CULTURE language architecture is based on DIFFERENTIATION.  The FRAGMENTATIVE nature of DIFFERENTIATION is responsible for DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in the representational capability of the language architecture.  What this DROP-OUT does is to reduce the REPRESENTATIONS of LANGUAGES such as ENGLISH and the Common Average European Languages (Whorf’s classification) to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT-ONLY REPRESENTATION capability which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPT of BALANCE to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT OF DIFFERENCE.  This ESSAY describes the CULTURE-SHIFTING IMPACT of ‘DUMBING DOWN’ QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC.  

 

* * * 

 

BELIEVE IT OR NOT, OUR WESTERN CULTURE IS SUBSTITUTING DIFFERENCE FOR BALANCE.

 

DIFFERENCE is the BINARY LOGIC REDUCTION OF QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE.

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON “BALANCE” (QUANTUM LOGIC) WHEREAS WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON “DIFFERENCE” (BINARY LOGIC)

 

BALANCE and DIFFERENCE offer us TWO APPROACHES to language design based on QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC.

 

The RELATIONSHIP between the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD is one of BALANCE, not DIFFERENCE.

 

NOTA BENE: ‘BALANCE’ IS ‘LESS SIMPLE’ THAN ‘DIFFERENCE’ AND ‘BALANCE’ IS SENSUAL WHILE ‘DIFFERENCE’ IS INTELLECTUAL.

 

An example of QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE) approach to language is where we capture a picture in terms of; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  Here we CAN see a FIGURE (an item of CONTENT) in a RESONATING or BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION with its CONTAINING GROUND (CONTAINER) wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE.  Alternatively, we CAN see FIGURE and GROUND as TWO which is the BINARY LOGIC (DIFFERENTIATION) based approach to language capture.

 

BOTH QUANTUM LOGIC “BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION” and BINARY LOGIC “DIFFERENTIATION” offer themselves as VIABLE FOUNDATIONS FOR A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and these TWO ARCHITECTURES are what DISTINGUISHES the languages of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS (along with Buddhists/Taoists and Advaita Vedanta adherents), … and , … THE WEST (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT LANGUAGE USERS).

 

THESE DIFFERING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES PUT US, PSYCHOLOGICALLY, INTO TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-BASED “REALITY ARCHITECTURES”, the ONE employing QUANTUM BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION, where we fashion such linguistic representations as the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , and the other being where we fashion linguistic representations using BINARY LOGIC; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’.

 

* * * * * * * * * *

  (more…)