We know that there is merit to Heraclitus’ aphorism “One can’t step into the same river twice because it is not the same river and not the same person stepping into it”

 

This is affirming, or at least suggesting, that we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

We also know the Zen story of the farmer’s son who broke his leg (bad news) while training a wild horse and was, as a result, passed over by the Warlord conscripting all able-bodied young men to go to battle, wherein, as it turned out, they all got slaughtered. Thus, breaking his leg turned out to be ‘good’ and not ‘bad’.

 

This INTERPLAY between CONTENT and CONTEXT, where the meaning-giving of CONTENT can be OVER-RIDDEN by the meaning-giving of CONTEXT is fundamental to our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

 

Thus, it is evident the world we live in is ambiguous, … but what is the nature of this ambiguity?   How about the case of the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN JUSTICE where we evidently choose to SIMPLIFY THE REALITY and can’t be bothered to take into account the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING that gives over-riding meaning to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION    The EGG-SHELL SKULL “makes the AUTHOR OF THE BLOW TO THE HEAD look POWERFUL” and because of our simple WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, which is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING ONLY BASED, we capture such events with statements like “the BLOW TO THE HEAD SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL”.

 

This is like saying “the rainfall rivulets joined together forming streams which joined together forming a raging river that scoured out a canyon”,  which is all MALE ASSERTING and which OMITS MENTION of THE FEMALE VALLEY that organized the collection of the little male rivulets, pulling them all together to form the RAGING RIVER and without the organizing influence of the FEMALE VALLEY (which, by the way, is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) the RAGING RIVER IN ALL ITS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MIGHT, WOULD NEVER HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE.

 

There we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS WITH OUR TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE) GO AGAIN!  DROPPING OUT THE MOST ESSENTIAL PART OF THE REALITY which is the FEMALE CONTAINER.  REMEMBER what BOHM said; ‘SPACE IS NOT EMPTY, IT IS FULL’   ,

 

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

 

Evidently, our LANGUAGE is giving SHORT SHRIFT TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, the PLENUM in which the material forms are CONDENSATIONS akin to clouds in the atmosphere.  Simply because the CONDENSATIONS are visible and the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is NOT visible, .. we have our language give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the MATERIAL FORMS aka the CONDENSATIONS!  NO! NO! NO!, the primary reality is the energy-charged PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and the visible CONDENSATIONS are SECONDARY.

In other words, in the INTERPLAY between CONTENT and CONTEXT, the meaning-giving of CONTENT can be OVER-RIDDEN by the meaning-giving of CONTEXT as is fundamental to our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

 

CONTENT is the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT while CONTEXT is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LATTER (CONTEXT) INCLUDES and prevails over the FORMER (CONTENT).

(more…)